Skip to main content
Demystifying QLACs
Guest Expert: Scott Witt, Actuary, Witt Actuarial services
Date:
Attendee's Excellent Rating: 89%
Bookmark
Webinar Replay Description

Click Here to Download Summary Below

Demystifying QLACs (Qualified Longevity Annuity Contracts)

Tom Dickson hosted the final live Financial Experts Network webinar of 2025, featuring Scott Witt, a fee-only insurance advisor specializing in life insurance, annuities, and long-term care insurance. Scott’s compensation model is strictly hourly or project-based, with no commissions or asset-based fees, positioning his analysis as independent and fiduciary in nature.

The session focused on Qualified Longevity Annuity Contracts (QLACs)—a narrowly defined type of longevity annuity designed to address longevity risk and required minimum distribution (RMD) challenges for retirees with qualified retirement accounts.


1. Annuity Landscape Context (Transcript Expansion)

Scott framed QLACs within the broader annuity universe:

  1. Deferred (Accumulation) Annuities
    Used primarily for tax deferral or guaranteed income riders, often oversold and frequently misused inside qualified accounts when no rider benefit exists.
  2. Immediate (Income) Annuities / SPIAs
    Provide income immediately, are often undersold, and function best as insurance against living too long, not as investments.
  3. Longevity (Deferred Income) Annuities
    Begin payments at a later age (often 75–85) and offer substantial “mortality leverage.” QLACs are a subset of this category with special tax treatment.

This broader framing helped clarify that QLACs are not general annuities, but a very specific planning tool.


2. What a QLAC Is—and Is Not

A QLAC is a longevity annuity created under Treasury regulations in 2014 to solve a specific problem: retirees being forced to take RMDs while still wanting to defer income to very advanced ages.

Key structural requirements (confirmed and fact-checked):

  • Must be funded via a tax-free transfer from a traditional IRA (not Roth).
  • Maximum investment is $210,000 per person, indexed for inflation (no longer limited by a percentage of account value under SECURE 2.0).
  • No cash value and irrevocable once purchased.
  • No variable or indexed components—payments must be fixed.
  • Income must begin no later than the first day of the month following age 85.
  • The amount used to purchase the QLAC is excluded from RMD calculations until income begins.
  • Annual reporting to both the IRS and the policyholder is required.

3. Tax Treatment and RMD Clarifications (Fact-Checked)

  • Funds used to purchase a QLAC are removed from the IRA balance used to calculate RMDs.
  • This does not prepay future RMDs; rather, it permanently excludes the QLAC amount from RMD calculations.
  • Once income begins, all payments are taxed as ordinary income.
  • QLAC income cannot be used to satisfy RMDs for the remaining IRA balance.

This aligns with Treasury Regulations and IRS guidance and corrects some common misconceptions raised during the live Q&A.


4. Longevity Leverage and Return Trade-Offs

Scott walked through detailed examples showing how QLAC economics work:

  • A 65-year-old male investing $210,000 with income starting at age 85 could receive over $100,000 annually for life.
  • The strategy produces:
    • Negative returns (even –100%) if death occurs before payments begin (life-only option).
    • Very attractive implied returns (5–7% pre-tax) if the individual lives into their late 80s, 90s, or beyond.
  • Adding a refund provision eliminates the possibility of losing principal but reduces income by roughly 15–20%, trading upside for downside protection.

Scott emphasized that this is true insurance, not an investment—participants are insuring against living a very long life.


5. Who QLACs May (and May Not) Be Appropriate For

Most appropriate for:

  • Healthy individuals with high longevity expectations
  • Conservative or risk-averse investors
  • Clients seeking to cap planning horizons at age 85
  • Individuals with meaningful (but not ultra-high) IRA balances
  • Those who value certainty over optionality

Less appropriate for:

  • Individuals in poor health
  • Those needing liquidity
  • Clients highly concerned about inflation risk
  • Ultra-wealthy households where $210,000 is immaterial
  • Anyone uncomfortable with the possibility of a total loss in exchange for longevity insurance

Scott emphasized that high RMD exposure alone is a weak reason to use a QLAC; longevity risk management is the stronger rationale.


6. Inflation, Liquidity, and Behavioral Realities

  • QLAC payments are fixed, creating inflation risk at very advanced ages.
  • No liquidity once purchased.
  • Many individuals underestimate longevity risk; Scott cited data showing a 25% chance that at least one spouse in a healthy 65-year-old couple reaches age 100.
  • Limited adoption is driven by:
    • Behavioral aversion to “losing” principal
    • Minimal advisor compensation
    • General misunderstanding of insurance vs. investment framing

7. Planning Insight from the Transcript

One of the most important takeaways was conceptual:
QLACs can replace Monte Carlo tail-risk assumptions with contractual certainty, potentially allowing retirees to:

  • Spend more confidently earlier in retirement
  • Take different portfolio risks
  • Reduce anxiety around extreme longevity outcomes

In some cases, simply modeling a QLAC helps clients realize they don’t need one—which Scott views as a successful planning outcome.


External Fact-Check and Reference Sources (Written-Out URLs)

IRS and Treasury guidance on QLACs

  • Treasury Regulation §1.401(a)(9)-6
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.401(a)(9)-6

IRS Required Minimum Distribution rules

SECURE 2.0 Act (QLAC limit changes)

Longevity statistics

Annuities and investor education

State guaranty association coverage

 

Attendees Comments:

missy@financialexpertsnetwork.com
A few comments from listeners when they were asked what the learned from the webinar:

It clarified some details about QLACs that I was fuzzy about, like it technically having to come from a IRA. It also reinforced some things that I held about who might consider QLACs like someone having an RMD 'problem' who is currently doing Roth conversions.
- Randall R.

I came away with a much better understanding of QLAC's, their benefits and negatives and the type of client it could be attractive to, those who are risk averse, worried about outliving their income from investment assets, have longevity in the family or have concerns about high RMD's. Also learned about a professional specialist I can reach out to for help with potential cases.
- David A.

Scott is a great guest because he brings an unbiased view of insurance products. His IRR numbers on QLACs were very helpful.
- Mark W.

The review was awesome - I do not use annuities often but I can see some application for particular clients in the future.
- Anne M.

missy@financia…

Fri, 12/19/2025 - 16:43

Comments
A few comments from listeners when they were asked what the learned from the webinar:

It clarified some details about QLACs that I was fuzzy about, like it technically having to come from a IRA. It also reinforced some things that I held about who might consider QLACs like someone having an RMD 'problem' who is currently doing Roth conversions.
- Randall R.

I came away with a much better understanding of QLAC's, their benefits and negatives and the type of client it could be attractive to, those who are risk averse, worried about outliving their income from investment assets, have longevity in the family or have concerns about high RMD's. Also learned about a professional specialist I can reach out to for help with potential cases.
- David A.

Scott is a great guest because he brings an unbiased view of insurance products. His IRR numbers on QLACs were very helpful.
- Mark W.

The review was awesome - I do not use annuities often but I can see some application for particular clients in the future.
- Anne M.
Demystifying QLACs 12-18-2025

Search Webinars, Sessions, and More